Threads / Government Digital Strategy Implementation / We asked the Treasury whether, as the lead for the Finance …
Committee Material Published 1 Mar 2024 ↗ View on Parliament

We asked the Treasury whether, as the lead for the Finance Function, it had shared the methods it had put in place to develop savings with other functions. The Treasury told us that the heads of functions met regularly as part of the Government Finance Function Efficiency and Performance Group, which focused on sharing best practice within functions, between functions, and across departments. However, the NAO, concluded that the Cabinet Office did not share examples of good practice between f...

We asked the Treasury whether, as the lead for the Finance Function, it had shared the methods it had put in place to develop savings with other functions. The Treasury told us that the heads of functions met regularly as part of the Government Finance Function Efficiency and Performance Group, which focused on sharing best practice within functions, between functions, and across departments. However, the NAO, concluded that the Cabinet Office did not share examples of good practice between functions, although functions would welcome this. The GIAA recommended that the Cabinet Office produced “principles-based” guidance for functions about ho Type: conclusion | Number: 19 | Response status: accepted Government response: 5.1 The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: end June 2025 5.2 The Cabinet Office will include case study examples of best practice for the 2023-24 efficiency and savings return guidance, showing how savings were calculate