The Cabinet Office told us that it did not produce a business case for its current strategy as it believed time was of the essence in terms of both cost opportunities and the fact that old systems were coming to the end of their contracts. It did not want to “put the cart before the horse” in terms of the detailed work needed on costs and benefits and felt that this would be better done at the cluster level.15 Instead, it produced a “Case for Change” which lacked the requisite level of detail...

The Cabinet Office told us that it did not produce a business case for its current strategy as it believed time was of the essence in terms of both cost opportunities and the fact that old systems were coming to the end of their contracts. It did not want to “put the cart before the horse” in terms of the detailed work needed on costs and benefits and felt that this would be better done at the cluster level.15 Instead, it produced a “Case for Change” which lacked the requisite level of detail on costs, benefits and risks.16 As part of the 2021 Spending Review, three clusters submitted bids, totalling £759 million, to HM Treasury for funding t Type: conclusion | Number: 11 | Response status: accepted Government response: The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: May 2024 (following Full Business Cases from Clusters) Upon Strategy launch, pace of delivery was prioritised, therefore business case development was led at the cluster level. Prac