Citing staffing problems, the contractor, Landmark Solution, did not complete the inSite project, even when granted an extension. The Cabinet Office terminated its contract with Landmark solutions in July 2022, by which point it had paid out £880,000 of the £1.3 million contract. The Cabinet Office told us that it negotiated a termination agreement with Landmark. Landmark has subsequently repaid £300,000 and the Cabinet Office has 9 Qq 10, 40–41, 50, 52 10 C&AG’s Report, 2.13 11 Q 8; C&AG’s R...

Citing staffing problems, the contractor, Landmark Solution, did not complete the inSite project, even when granted an extension. The Cabinet Office terminated its contract with Landmark solutions in July 2022, by which point it had paid out £880,000 of the £1.3 million contract. The Cabinet Office told us that it negotiated a termination agreement with Landmark. Landmark has subsequently repaid £300,000 and the Cabinet Office has 9 Qq 10, 40–41, 50, 52 10 C&AG’s Report, 2.13 11 Q 8; C&AG’s Report, 2.13 12 C&AG’s Report, Figure 5 13 Q 13 14 Q 8 15 C&AG’s Report, 2.16. 16 Q 8 17 Q 20; C&AG’s Report, 2.14 18 2018 strategy. 19 Q 20. 20 Q 18; C&A Type: conclusion | Number: 9 | Response status: not_addressed Government response: 1. PAC conclusion: The Cabinet Office does not have the data or IT system necessary to oversee and manage the government estate. 1. PAC recommendation: The Cabinet Office should get its new property database up and running as soon as possible. It should: • ensure