Threads / Managing Radioactive Substances and Nuclear Decommissioning / Given the centrality of its role we asked the Department wh…
Committee Material Published 20 May 2022 ↗ View on Parliament

Given the centrality of its role we asked the Department whether its own role was subject to sufficient scrutiny and whether AGR decommissioning should be included in the Government Major Projects Portfolio. The Department told us that similar concerns had been raised by HM Treasury and Cabinet Office. However, the Department said that it did not think that it was appropriate for the programme to be included in the GMPP while it was being delivered by EDFE but expected it to be put on the GMP...

Given the centrality of its role we asked the Department whether its own role was subject to sufficient scrutiny and whether AGR decommissioning should be included in the Government Major Projects Portfolio. The Department told us that similar concerns had been raised by HM Treasury and Cabinet Office. However, the Department said that it did not think that it was appropriate for the programme to be included in the GMPP while it was being delivered by EDFE but expected it to be put on the GMPP once more stations are transferred to NDA control. We have asked the Department to explain why the programme should not be added to the GMPP sooner and Type: conclusion | Number: 31 | Response status: not_addressed Government response: The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: November 2022 7.2 Monitoring, reporting, and assurance processes and structures were put into place following the agreement of the revised AGR defueling and decommissioning arr