Department for Transport
High confidence
DfT's stated position is that the AV Act 2024 delivers a 'world-leading' regulatory framework and that accelerating the APS permitting scheme is a Plan-for-Change growth priority, with safety to be independently assessed, monitored and enforced.May 2024Jun 2025Apr 2026
Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CCAV)
High confidence
CCAV frames its role as delivering the AV Act implementation programme for safe deployment, including dedicated research on inclusivity, emergency response and public understanding of automation terms.Feb 2025Mar 2026Jun 2025Jun 2025
Heidi Alexander
High confidence
As Secretary of State for Transport, has used WMSs to position APS commencement as central to government growth objectives and to commit to consultation-led implementation.Jul 2025
Simon Lightwood
High confidence
On APS specifically: signed SI 2026/439 and the April 2026 WMS confirming 15 May 2026 go-live, framing the scheme as a 'key step' in AV Act implementation that supports economic growth.Apr 2026Apr 2026
Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill
High confidence
On the AV regulatory framework as a whole: delivered the Lords mirror WMSs at each implementation milestone (APS launch, Dec 2025 call for evidence, April 2026 permit-scheme go-live), maintaining the government's accelerated implementation line.Apr 2026Dec 2025Jul 2025
Lilian Greenwood
High confidence
On APS regulations: announced in HCWS692 the government's decision to accelerate APS regulations, subject to consultation outcomes.Jun 2025Jun 2025
Regulatory Policy Committee
High confidence
On the APS permitting SI: issued a formal opinion on DfT's options assessment, providing independent scrutiny of the impact-assessment underpinnings of SI 2026/439.Apr 2026Apr 2026
Public Accounts Committee
Medium confidence
On AV infrastructure readiness: recorded DfT's position that AV tech must be capable of operating using existing highway infrastructure, with no immediate change planned to road maintenance — implicitly flagging a deliverability gap.Jan 2025Dec 2024
Law Commission of England and Wales
High confidence
On regulatory architecture: jointly recommended a unified AV regulatory framework with safety assurance, ASDE accountability and user-in-charge immunity — the doctrinal basis of the AV Act.Jan 2022
Scottish Law Commission
High confidence
Co-author of the 2022 joint report — same substantive position as the Law Commission of England and Wales on regulatory architecture.Jan 2022
House of Commons Transport Committee
High confidence
On the pre-Act framework: the Committee's 2023 Seventh Report described the existing AV laws as 'archaic and limiting' and called for a cautious, gradual approach with well-defined deployment contexts.Sep 2023Nov 2023
Olly Glover
High confidence
On the AV regulatory perimeter: tabling PQs pressing DfT on the absence of regulation for pavement delivery robots and their impact on disabled pedestrians — flagging a gap in the wider self-driving regime.Apr 2026Apr 2026
Dr Scott Arthur
Medium confidence
On adjacent ADAS regulation: PQ 129740 presses for mandatory ADAS assessment in the MOT — pushing the regime's scope towards driver-assistance, not just full automation.Apr 2026
Tony Vaughan
Low confidence
On road safety more broadly: PQ 129515 elicited DfT's positioning of AV regulation within the January 2026 Road Safety Strategy.Apr 2026
Sarah Coombes
Medium confidence
On AV deployment: opened the 28 October 2025 Westminster Hall debate on connected and automated vehicles, with first-hand reference to a self-driving demonstration in central London.Oct 2025